As the president prepares to address the nation
this evening regarding ISIS/Syria, it is worth taking a moment to reflect on how
the Syrian crisis and later the ISIS crisis came to be.
In the spring of 2011, moderate students, small
business owners, academics and others took the streets of Damascus, Syrian to
protest the tyrannical reign of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. This was part
of the larger regional democratic push coined as the “Arab Spring.”
These protestors were not jihadists. They were
not radicals. They were fathers and mothers, husbands and wives who simply
longed for the same values we cherish – freedom of assembly, free and fair
elections and a fair and open judicial process among them. They also dared to
seek rights we do not ever think to cherish such as the right to not be
tortured by the intelligence service of your own government for verbalizing any
criticism of the president or his policies.
For the first time in decades there appeared to
be hope that the people of Syria may soon see the dawn of freedom. There
was a rising army of non-extremist, freedom thirsty Syrians who were willing to
risk their lives and their families’ lives to demand President Assad be removed
and with him his dictatorship of terror. These men and women took the streets
by the thousands hopeful that their cries for freedom would be heard not only
in Damascus but also in the United Nations and Washington.
Their world of hopeful revolution, however,
quickly slide into a geopolitical twilight zone where a calculating
dictator out maneuvered a vacillating U.S. president and a divided UN Security
Council, leaving the dictator free to openly and brazenly unleash a war of
destruction and murder that continues to this day.
With no significant international resistance and
a desperate lust to cling to power Assad began a military campaign against his
own population. Documented tactics included, and still include, the use of
barrel bombs dropped on open markets, hospitals and apartment buildings,
chlorine gas dropped from helicopters into small towns indiscriminately killing
civilians, and the systematic torture of women and children believed to be
sympathetic to the opposition -often implementing the barbaric process of
blade torture and stoning.
According to the Immigration Policy Center, an
estimated 9 million Syrians have been forced to flee their homes since the
revolution began. Two and half million have sought refuge in camps along the
Turkish and Jordanian borders with Syria while another 6 million remain
displaced within Syrian.
More than 190, 000 Syrian civilians have been
killed since March 2011.
Assad also recognized the need to keep Western
nations at bay. To accomplish this he strategically released hundreds of
radicalized jihadists from Syrian prisons who had been captured entering Syria
following the U.S. Iraq war and deported them back to Iraq. It was there that
these terror warriors who had been battle hardened during the last Iraq war
organized with other similar groups and in June 2013 formed the Islamic State
of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
U.S. Senator John McCain has astutely stated,
“It’s obvious that Bashar al-Assad’s strategy is to present us with a choice of
ISIS or him so that eventually we will choose him.” Intelligence reports
support this this claim indicating that Assad intentionally introduced radical
elements into the moderate oppositional forces that were successfully fighting
his regime. With Al-Qaeda- like fighters claiming opposition to Assad and
fighting inside Syria there became little hope of U.S. intervention in support
of even the most legitimate rebel forces.
In the vacuum of any U.N. or U.S. strategy to
develop a coalition of opposition, ISIS was free to grow within Syria and enter
Iraq. Social media outlets are now filled with images and reports of the
incalculable toll the evil of ISIS has taken on the people of northern Iraq and
Syria – Christian and Muslim alike.
In addition, ISIS has taken control of all oil
fields inside Syria and those of northern Iraq. This has given them a
strategic advantage no other extremist group has in the region, a sustainable
and significant funding source that is not reliant ideological support. Who is
the purchaser of this oil? Syrian President Assad.
President Assad continues to support ISIS through
the purchase of oil as well as the exchanging of intelligence regarding the
moderate freedom fighters that continue their desperate struggle. According to
David Butter, an expert on Syria and an associate fellow at the think-tank
Chatham House, Assad’s intelligence service works closely with ISIS both in
regards to weapons and funding.
It should be noted that the American journalist,
James Foley, was kidnapped in Aleppo, Syria in 2012 and turned over to Syrian
intelligence. He is believed to have been held at a Syrian Air Base by Syrian
intelligence officers before strangely being turned over to ISIS who then so
gruesomely murdered him as a means of taunting the United States.
It is the belief of this author that we must look
past the occasional fighting between ISIS and Assad and recognize that some
dark deal has been made between the two. Given the genesis of ISIS and the lack
of effort Assad is employing to stop ISIS along the Iraqi border and around
Aleppo, it seems plausible that he is willing to give them ground in exchange
for their assurance not to march on Damascus. For their part Assad’s
willingness to insure a steady purchase of oil would be motivation enough to
agree. Although their long-term goals cannot co-exist, far stranger bedfellows
have been brought together in search of short-term gains.
If President Obama is successful in persuading
Congress and the American people that it is in our national interest to support
the destruction of ISIS, then we must also recognize that the only way to
achieve this is to simultaneously support the downfall of Bashar al-Assad and
the rise of a Syria free to choose the path the people of Syria began walking
in the spring of 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.